San Quentin News

Written By Incarcerated - Advancing Social Justice

Archives for December 2014

Original Production of Waterline Calls Forth a Standing Ovation

by

Art often imitates life, and when executed well, an audience is able to draw connections between the performance and reality through the power of the narrative. On Oct. 4, the original prison production of Waterline did just that.
Waterline is an interpretative performance utilizing modern dance and dramatic monologue. Based on the life stories of five prisoners, Waterline was performed by the Artistic Ensemble, a drama therapy group of 14 men at San Quentin. Prior to the play’s debut, these men collaborated to write, choreograph and produce this piece of art. It brought the audience to a standing ovation at its finish.

Gino Savacos and Carlos Flores rolling bodies across the floor

Gino Savacos and Carlos Flores
rolling bodies across the floor


The directors helped the men to tell their stories by first having them workshop their written stories. At the time of the writing workshop, Anouthinh Pangthong, an actor in Waterline, said he didn’t know it was going to turn into something bigger.
“With the creative vision of the directors, our stories became woven together over an eight-month period,” said Pangthong.
The directors guided the men in choreographing and turning their stories into a performance worth viewing.
The production was not without its challenges. “There were some creative differences that arose, but at the end of the day, we put our egos aside and made it work,” Pangthong admitted.
During rehearsals, the troupe of actors would break up into groups to go over lines after warm-ups, which included tongue-twisters, movement exercises, improvising and a lot of laughing, according to Pangthong.
“Waterline was one of the most moving things I’ve seen since I arrived at San Quentin,” said Dwight Krizman.
The sound of rain greeted viewers as they took their seats in the Protestant Chapel at San Quentin. More than 60 citizens and 100 prisoners crowded into the building to watch the production.
At the start of the show, the actors lay in fetal positions. “It quenches our thirst and aids in our birth,” a voice narrated to the sound of the rain. The image of water was present in most of the scenes as a figurative thread to help tie the stories together. In several respects, water served as a metaphor for life in all its forms, both stagnant and fast-paced.
Throughout the play, different life stories were woven into the production in a seamless fashion.
Ginno Savacos serenading the crowd while being lifted away

Ginno Savacos serenading
the crowd while being lifted away


One cast member led each story, accompanied by the movements of the other actors.
Carlos Meza, who performs under the name “Losdini,” commanded the audience’s attention as he walked in a serpentine manner stepping on pieces of white paper placed at his feet by the other actors. At the end of his movement, he said: “I am not what I was. I am aware. I am.”
Meza explained that the white papers symbolize the endless court documents that often dictate the direction of prisoners’ lives behind bars.
Later on in the show, Pangthong narrated his life story as a Laotian refugee. His story mirrored that of Kroung Songkra, a Cambodian refugee who paroled in 2014 prior to the performance. Meza played Songkra in his life depiction.
Both Pangthong and Songkra’s stories told of generational trauma, the repercussions of tragic experiences passed from one generation to the next. Songkra’s mother was forced to watch the Khmer Rouge eat her own father’s heart, a scene that was depicted in the play. Pangthong told the story of his pregnant mother crossing a river in a bicycle inner-tube in hopes of providing her son with a better life on the other side.
Chris Marshall playing the arresting officer escorting Gary Martin, who was struck out to prison

Chris Marshall playing the arresting officer
escorting Gary Martin, who was struck out to prison


Their life stories circled back to their own births, which were depicted through dance. Some audience members shed tears as they witnessed the reenactments of these two men’s births.
The show ended with the story of Rodney Capell imagining his release from prison after 25 years of incarceration. “I wonder if, after a quarter century, a quarter-pounder with cheese tastes the same,” Capell laments.
The statement provoked thought: What else has this man missed out on in 25 years of incarceration?
The Insight Prison Project, a restorative justice program and nonprofit, sponsors the Artistic Ensemble inside the walls of San Quentin.
According to a statement in the front of the Waterline program, “The Artistic Ensemble is a rigorous, creative practice at San Quentin Prison where participants develop artistic tools with which to explore personal journeys and their intersection with systemic forces of poverty, violence, power and incarceration.”
Juan Meza, Carlos Flores, JulianGlenn Padgett and Antoine Williams pulling forward because they don’t want to be stuck

Juan Meza, Carlos Flores, JulianGlenn Padgett and Antoine Williams pulling forward because they don’t want to be stuck


Waterline director Amy Dowling said the group did not initially intend to produce a public performance.
“When we first met, we were not moving towards a performance. We spent time talking, writing, and discussing issues,” Dowling said. “In the end, the stories that got told are the ones the men wanted to be heard.”
Cast members included Adnan Khan, Anouthinh Pangthong, Antwon William, Carols Flores, Chris Marshall, Sr., Eric Lowery, Garey Martin, Gary Harrell, Gino Sevacos, Ira Perry, JulianGlenn Padgett, Losdini, Nate Collins, Neiland Franks, Richie Morris, Rodney Capell and Upumoni Ama. Directors included Amie Dowling, Freddy Gutierrez, Tatiana Chaterji and Sebastian Alvarez.
 

The Immigration Muddle

by

The 2014 elections put both houses of Congress under Republican control.
In spite of this, President Barack Obama is using his executive power to ease the pathway to citizenship for the nearly 5 million immigrants who contribute to the U.S. economy.
Obama’s speech addressed illegal immigration and the effects that deportation has on children with undocumented parents.
He said, “I’ve seen the heartbreak and anxiety of children whose mothers might be taken away from them just because they didn’t have the right papers.”
“I continue to believe that the best way to solve this problem is by working together to pass that kind of common sense law. But until that happens, there are actions I have the legal authority to take as President – the same kinds of actions taken by Democratic and Republican presidents before me – that will help make our immigration system more fair and more just.”
“But today, our immigration system is broken — and everybody knows it.
“Families who enter our country the right way and play by the rules watch others flout the rules. Business owners who offer their workers good wages and benefits see the competition exploit undocumented immigrants by paying them far less.
“All of us take offense to anyone who reaps the rewards of living in America without taking on the responsibilities of living in America. And undocumented immigrants who desperately want to embrace those responsibilities see little option but to remain in the shadows, or risk their families being torn apart.”

“But today, our immigration system

is broken — and everybody knows it”

Until an immigration plan is established, the threat of deportation puts millions of children of undocumented immigrants at risk. The children struggle with cognitive, emotional and social problems because of the possibility of being separated from their parents.
The lack of clarity in the immigration policy weakens families and leads to inequality of children’s life chances. The differences in living conditions and disparate access to resources and social safety nets cause disruption. The disruption affects thinking and has long-term consequences for children of immigrants.
In turn, this puts children at risk by impeding their integration or ability to settle into local communities. The health, education and economic integration of those at-risk children also define the nation’s future.
Since this population is an obvious determinant of our future, it must be addressed now.
It was those observations and the lack of Republican support on a comprehensive immigration strategy that guided the Obama administration into action.
The number of children in the U.S. with at least one foreign-born parent is growing rapidly and is becoming a significant portion of the U.S. population. Understanding this dynamic, the future immigration policy will some day fall into the hands of people our leaders have failed and refused to consider.
More than half of the children of immigrants today come from Latin-American origin, and over 40 percent come from one country: Mexico.
Two other areas provide virtually all children of immigrants today. Asia, which includes China, makes up about 20 percent, and those of Caribbean origin contribute the balance.
By failing to address the undocumented and the immigration issue, the U.S. is casting a wide net of possible failure and negative result, for a huge portion of our future generations.
Political leaders must get real, and face the fact that past government policies have failed to address ever-growing numbers of undocumented immigrants living among us.

Appreciation of Knowledge

by

Hello Lt. Robinson,
I just wanted to reach out and say I really appreciated the article about Officer Hauwert’s transition. It’s incredibly brave of her to be so open, and I think the author of the article did a good job of reporting on the story in a fair way. I really believe transgender hatred comes from fear and lack of knowledge, so sharing these stories is really important. If it is appropriate to pass on my sentiment to either or both people, please do. Thank you for approving this story.
Patty

Lio de la Inmigración

by

Las elecciones del 2014 sitúan ambas casas del Congreso bajo el control de los Republicanos.
A pesar de esto, el Presidente Barack Obama esta utilizando su poder ejecutivo para facilitar el camino a la ciudadanía de casi cinco millones de inmigrantes que contribuyen a la economía de los estados Unidos.
El discurso de Obama fue dirigido a la inmigración ilegal y a los efectos que la deportación ocasiona a los niños con padres indocumentados.
Él dijo, “He visto el sufrimiento y la ansiedad de los niños cuyas madres podrían ser arrebatadas solo por no tener los documentos adecuados.”
“Sigo creyendo que la mejor forma para resolver este problema es trabajando juntos para aprobar esa ley de sentido común. Pero hasta que eso ocurra, existen acciones que como presidente tengo la autoridad legal para tomar – la misma clase de acciones tomadas por los anteriores presidentes Demócratas y Republicanos – esto ayudara a que nuestro sistema de inmigración sea más justo e imparcial.”
“Pero en este momento, nuestro sistema de inmigración esta desintegrado – y todos lo saben.”
“Las familias que entran a nuestro país de la manera apropiada y obedecen las reglas, observan como otras personas ignoran las leyes. Los empresarios que ofrecen a sus trabajadores buen salario y beneficios observan como la competencia explota a los inmigrantes indocumentados al pagarles menos.”
“Todos nosotros nos ofendemos cuando alguien obtiene los beneficios de vivir en América sin asumir las responsabilidades que conlleva vivir en América. Inmigrantes indocumentados que quieren desesperadamente aceptar esas responsabilidades no tiene mucha opción más que permanecer en las sombras o correr el riesgo de que sus familias sean separadas.”
Hasta que un plan de inmigración sea establecido, la amenaza de la deportación pone en riesgo a millones de niños de padres indocumentados. Los niños luchan con problemas sociales, emocionales y cognitivos porque existe la posibilidad de ser separados de sus padres.
La falta de claridad en la póliza de inmigración debilita las familias y esto lleva a la desigualdad de oportunidades en la vida de los niños. Las diferencias en las condiciones de vida y la desigualdad de acceso a los recursos y redes de seguridad social ocasionan una alteración. La alteración afecta la forma de pensar y tiene consecuencias a largo plazo para los hijos de inmigrantes.
A su vez, esto pone en riesgo a los niños ya que dificulta su integración o aptitud para establecerse en las comunidades locales. La salud, educación y la integración económica de esos niños que están en riesgo también determinan el futuro de la nación.
Debido a que esta población es un determinante obvio de nuestro futuro, debe ser tomado en consideración ahora.
Estas observaciones y la falta de apoyo de los Republicanos sobre una estrategia integral de inmigración fue lo que llevo a la administración de Obama a tomar cartas en el asunto.
El número de niños en los Estados Unidos con al menos un padre nacido en el extranjero esta creciendo rápidamente y esta llegando a ser una porción significante de la población de los Estados Unidos. Entendiendo esta dinámica, la póliza de inmigración futura algún día caerá en las manos de esa gente que nuestros líderes se han rehusado y fallado a considerar.
Más de la mitad de los hijos de inmigrantes de ahora son de origen Latino-Americano, y más del 40% provienen de un país-México.
Hoy, otras dos áreas suministran virtualmente todos los hijos de inmigrantes: Asia, la cual incluye China, forman cerca del 20%, y aquellos de origen caribeño contribuyen el resto.
Al no considerar a los indocumentados y el tema de inmigración, los Estados Unidos, están arrojando una red amplia de posibles fracasos y resultados negativos para una gran parte de nuestras futuras generaciones.
Los líderes políticos deben ser realistas y enfrentar la realidad que las pólizas gubernamentales previas han fallado en considerar el constante incremento del número de inmigrantes indocumentados viviendo entre nosotros.
–Traducción por Marco Villa/ Tare Beltranchuc

Los Angeles County Jail Lawsuit and Realignment

by

Los Angeles expects a lawsuit will challenge the overcrowding and poor conditions in its jails resulting from Realignment, the county district attorney says.
“You know another lawsuit is coming,” says L.A. District Attorney Jackie Lacey. “We’re next.”
Imagine triple-stacked bunk beds spaced one foot apart with toilets placed in the middle rows without partitions. This describes one of the temporary living quarters crammed with more than 200 inmates at the Men’s Central Jail (MCJ) in Los Angeles.
According to Christina Villacorte of the L.A. Daily News, Sheriff’s Capt. Daniel Dyer grimaced during a recent inspection as he pointed out the men having to eat and sleep a few feet from the toilets. “That’s just wrong,” he said.
MCJ was built in 1963 and has a long history of failing pipes, rusted gates, broken doors, leaking sewage, failing air conditioning systems. Most of the businesses that produced replacement parts to repair these problems no longer exist.
Juan Hernandez, a drug offender said, “Attitudes are popping off.” Another drug offender, Andy Gurule, said he preferred being homeless on the streets rather than being held at MCJ.
Prison Realignment (AB 109) has pushed this overcrowding to the point of forcing L.A. County to hold more than two or three state prison populations. MCJ’s population was about 15,000 three years ago and it now holds 19,000 – 4,000 more than government regulations allow, the newspaper reported.
Gov. Jerry Brown has created a crisis by requiring counties to keep low-level offenders who were once shipped to a state prison, noted County Assistant Chief Executive Officer Ryan Alsop.
The federal courts prompted Realignment when California prisons were declared so overcrowded they violate the Constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
The price tag to fix the MCJ situation permanently is a whopping $1.7 billion to demolish the facility and build a modern corrections facility on that site, according to a recent environmental study requested by the county Board of Supervisors.

From Nearly Dead … to Alive and Near Release

by

After 34 years in prison, Dennis Wayne Pratt is scheduled to walk out of San Quentin on Feb. 1 – a former drug addict who has turned his life in a completely new direction.
His transformation began on Aug. 28, 1988, when drug-filled balloons broke inside his body.
“I thought I was going to die,” Pratt recalls. “I yelled out to God: ‘If you get me through this, I will never use drugs or drink again!’”
Pratt ended up being taken to the hospital and later was charged with drug possession.
“I’ve been clean and sober ever since, but I’m still involved with drugs. Only this time I’m a state-certified addiction counselor. I went from one extreme to another,” Pratt said.
Pratt also gives credit to the self-help group Victim’s Offender’s Education Group (VOEG), which he says helped him understand the victim’s point of view.
“I had to become truthful and honest with myself and own up to my stuff and walk through the fire,” Pratt said.
“Prior to this hearing, every one of my parole board hearings resembled the Clint Eastwood movie ‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly,’ said Pratt. “I’d go in there, sit down and as soon as the commissioners would begin asking me questions, I’d hear the theme song from that movie in my mind.”
Pratt equates his current success of being found suitable with three things: pursuing his education, taking self-help classes and the connection with his wife.
As a child he was told he was mentally retarded, and for many years believed that.
Now he has an Associate of Arts degree from Patten College Prison University Project, a diploma from Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary and is three classes away from getting a second seminary diploma.
He and four other prisoners earned drug counseling certificates. “We’re the first in the world to become (CADC) addiction counselors while still incarcerated,” he said.
The CADC exams were the most difficult tests he had ever taken in his life, Pratt said.
“Yet I passed. A mentally challenged individual may not have been able to accomplish that,” said Pratt. “While I attended Patten, I proved to myself that I’m not dumb, I’m not stupid and I am somebody.”
Other programs he completed were Brother’s Keepers and Addiction Counseling Training (ACT), which taught him how to identify his problems.
“Understand, when I first came to prison these self-help groups weren’t available for prisoners, and they should have been,” said Pratt. “Because years after my incarceration I was still getting into serious trouble.”
Pratt, 57, was born in 1957 and convicted of the second-degree murder of Edward Sexton.
“I was burglarizing his home at the time, and Mr. Sexton woke up and confronted me; unfortunately, I made the worst decision ever, and I took his life,” Pratt said. “I was a drug addict and my thought process was so messed up at that time I was thinking I didn’t want to get busted for burglary.”
Pratt said it has taken him years to learn how to think and take responsibility for his crimes. Now is not the time to play games with the board, especially by going in there and spouting law to the board members, he advises.
“Telling them what they can and can’t do — no way. Now is the time to go in there and own your stuff and don’t make excuses, and if it puts you in a worse light, so be it,” he said. “That shows them you’re taking full responsibility.”
Pratt emphasizes answering their questions truthfully and honestly.
“If the truth of your crime is ugly, they want to know how you got to the point in your life where you chose to take another person’s life, because it shows that you’re being honest with yourself and that you’re not trying to hide anything,” said Pratt.
His journey through CDCR has taken him from San Quentin to Old Folsom in 1981, to Soledad Central in 1983, to CMC in 1986 and back to San Quentin in 1993, where he has been ever since.
Even though he has made positive strides with his addiction, Pratt said that he would like to improve his relationship with family members.
“I’ve been disowned by my sister, and she considers me to be dead. She bases her decision on both my crime and my incarceration,” Pratt said.
Pratt also has a daughter who was six months old when he came to prison. She has three sons he has never met.
“I would love to have a relationship with my daughter and my grandsons. But I understand that will take time, too,” said Pratt.
Even without having a relationship with his sister and his daughter, Pratt says he still has found happiness with his wife, who he married in 1997.
“That was one of the most incredible experiences in my life when I saw her the first time, all dressed up and coming toward me. She took my breath away,” said Pratt. “And she still takes my breath away every time I see her, oh yeah.”
Pratt said the first thing that he is going to do is when he gets out is go fishing.
“I want to have barbecue and get my garden started and put a sign on my door that says ‘Gone Fishing,’ oh yeah.”

Study Shows Recidivism Rate Still a Problem

by

Recidivism is alive and doing well, according to a federal study.
The Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Statistics conducted a recidivism statistics study from 2005 to 2010 in 30 states. On average, 75 percent of all prisoners released were re-incarcerated within a three- to five-year-period.

Survey

Three out of four inmates are re-incarcerated within five years of release, according to the survey.
“Prisoners released after serving time for a property offense were the most likely to be arrested,” according to the statisticians. Drugs and public order was next, followed closely by violent offenders.
The statistics illustrated that if a prisoner had been arrested more than 10 times, the chances of recidivism were much higher. Statisticians term these inmates as “recidivist.”

Violent Crime

The survey shows that 33.1 percent of violent crime offenders were typically re-arrested for violent crime offenses during this five-year period.
When the statistics are broken down into ages, the under-24 group had the highest rate of five-year recidivism at 84.1 percent, and the over-40 group was lower at 69.2 percent.
A recent background update for the bureau is if they started sharing data with the FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS), and the International Justice and Public Safety Network (Nlets) to provide the Department of Justice access to criminal history records as of 2008. A security agreement was executed between these agencies to ensure confidentiality.

Criminal History

Nlets developed the Criminal History Records Information Sharing (CHRIS) automated collection system for statistics bureaus to retrieve nationwide criminal history records.
There are several statistical avenues and logical paths to manipulate these percentages by race, gender, crimes, geographic locations, and states, but they all point to the same average for re-incarceration.

10,000 Weekly Parolees Have No Place to Call Home

by

Many of the approximately 10,000 men and women who parole weekly from U.S. prisons have no home to go to, which contributes to ineffective reintegration and higher recidivism, reported Christopher Moraff in Next City magazine.
Moraff wrote that 10 percent of those paroled are homeless immediately after their release. In the larger urban cities, where parolees were addicted to drugs, the number was as high as 30 percent.
Faith Lutze, criminal justice professor at Washington State University, said, “Without a safe and stable place to live where they can focus on improving themselves and securing their future, all of their energy is focused on the immediate need to survive the streets.” When surviving the streets becomes the primary goal of the formerly incarcerated, there is less time spent on effectively and successfully reintegrating.
For parolees, finding drug treatment facilities, employment, education and for some, mental health treatment is essential to successful reintegration. However, before any of these factors can be pursued, stable housing is imperative in order for an individual’s parole plan to have a chance of succeeding.
Moraff reported that the formerly incarcerated often have difficulty locating property owners who will rent to them, and more importantly, have trouble accumulating the three months’ rent usually required to rent a dwelling.
A team of researchers recently completed a comprehensive assessment of a Washington state program that aims to reduce recidivism. The program’s goal was to provide a year of housing support for high-risk offenders upon their release. The results showed a significant reduction in the number of inmates returning to prison and fewer paroles revoked.
Historically, only a few pioneering nonprofits focus their efforts on providing housing for ex-cons. In New York, the Fortune Society runs two successful transitional housing programs. The Delancey Street Foundation in San Francisco provides housing along with its drug treatment program.
With the success of such programs, state governments are beginning to take notice. In New York, the Department of Corrections helped launch a housing program called FUSE (Frequent User Service Enhancement) to keep 200 homeless ex-inmates out of jails and shelters. Not only did the program benefit the individuals involved, it also reduced overall yearly costs by $15,000 per person.
Similar programs now are being implemented in a dozen other cities nationwide. In the near future, the increased availability of transitional housing could enhance public safety and greatly reduce the economic and human costs of recidivism.

State Audit Slams How Mentally Ill Can Acquire Guns

by

An audit conducted by the Bureau of State Audits last October slammed the California Department of Justice and the courts for failing to identify thousands of mentally ill people who shouldn’t have access to firearms, reported the Sacramento Bee.
The audit revealed that 34 out of 58 county Superior Courts failed to file at least 2,300 prohibited person reports to the Department of Justice’s mental health unit from 2010-2012. The actual number of unfiled reports may even be higher because of under-reporting, according to the audit.
Legislation by lawmakers early last year appropriated $24 million to the department to reduce the backlog of cases of prohibited individuals possessing guns. That number was nearly 21,000 in July 2013. The audit cautioned that public security is jeopardized by the failure of authorities to gather and process prohibited person reports from the courts and mental health institutions.
“It is critical that justice improve its outreach and internal processes so its agents can better protect the public from armed prohibited persons,” the audit said, requesting the Justice Department to increase its outreach and for lawmakers to mandate that reports be filed within 24 hours on all mental health-related prohibited persons.
The Armed Prohibited Persons System, which logs people who cannot purchase or possess a gun, is supposed to receive these reports following a court’s finding that a mentally ill person poses a danger to others.
Court officials in the majority of the 34 laggard counties said they were not aware of the filing requirements and accused the Justice Department of failing to remind them or mental-health facilities. The audit also found the Justice Department has struggled to process the reports it does receive.
Stephen J. Lindley, chief of the Justice Department’s Bureau of Firearms, said it agrees with the audit’s recommendations and plans to communicate more with the courts and other entities required to file the reports.
The Administration Office of the Courts said, however, opposed the audit’s recommendation for legislation requiring the courts to file prohibited-person reports within 24 hours. Current law requires the reports “immediately.” (A law to extend the time to two court workdays took effect in early 2014.)

“It is critical that justice improve its

outreach and internal processes so its

agents can better protect the

public from armed prohibited persons”

“Given the unprecedented budget cuts to the judicial branch, limited business hours and staff, and other resource issues, the shorter deadline is not recommended,” said Stephen Jahr, the administrative director of the courts. Nevertheless, auditors stood by their recommendation, calling the suggested change “important to public safety.”
A statement by Assemblymen Katcho Achadjian (R-San Luis Obispo) said the report “confirmed our worst fears — that information about individuals who should be on the list of armed prohibited persons is not being fully reported and is not being reported immediately as required by law.”

Who Checks on the Jails in 58 Counties?

by

Recent legislation has made county jails and agencies responsible for housing and treating non-violent offenders. But who is responsible for those overseeing 58 counties in California? The answer is California’s Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC), reported The Chronicle of Social Change.
BSCC is a relatively unknown agency with 83 employees and a relatively modest annual budget ($16 million), but some believe it is capable of exerting tremendous influence because it controls the money that county and state agencies need to treat offenders, renovate jails and build new facilities.
“The BSCC is arguably the most powerful corrections body in the state,” said Brian Goldstein, a policy analyst who works for the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice (CSC). “They oversee data collection, programming and facility grants and the development of regulations across California’s 58 counties.”

“The BSCC is arguably the most

powerful corrections body in the state”

The agency has been criticized for approving money for programs whose success or failure has not been connected to the collected data, reported CSC. Board members attribute their problems to inadequate and outdated resources and a complicated system.
Two examples given in the report of complications are that there is no agreed-upon definition for recidivism, and that data collection is difficult. According to board Chair Linda Penner (Fresno County’s former probation chief), data collection is problematic because, “There are 58 counties, doing it 58 different ways.”
Gov. Jerry Brown formed the BSCC in 2012, appointing one member of the public to sit with 10 law enforcement officials, one juvenile justice expert and one adult treatment expert. According to CSC, it was formed to be an administrative leader that influences policy and manages costs.
They monitor about 500 California jails and holding cells as well as about 100 juvenile halls and camps.

Translate »