To whom it may Concern:
First and for most, I like to open by saying I pray the content of my writing here finds you and all your staff members under God’s never-ending care.
Received the paper, or rather, one of the papers, I paid for. Thank you for the time and effort. However, you’re right: I haven’t or didn’t receive the other.
Which is a very small issue in comparison to the two other questions I have. My first question would be, do you always respond to your subscribers in such a brief and unconcerned way? Forgive me if I’m wrong, however, once again you made me feel as if I didn’t deserve a proper response to my inquiry, concerning not only the stamps I sent. But mainly what happened to the articles I sent? Do I not deserve an adequate response since I’m an inmate? Or would you respond in like manner to your outside subscribers? I hope not. Very unprofessional.
In regards to the three articles, all of which were matters of substance. Things in which we as matured individuals should consider. In what way did they not meet your standards? Please consider I took time to try to enhance the quality of your paper by taking time to write them. And due to my age, and not having a typewriter on hand, you were entitled to correct any mistakes I made, so I’m totally confused as to what happened.
I realize you can’t write everyone to say why your paper couldn’t print every article. That’s quite understandable. However, you can honor their request by sending their stamps or money to see to it they get them.
Thank you Carl P.
Editor’s response:
Thank you for your letter and concern. We would like to humbly apologize for the inconvenience that we caused you. We are currently in the process of moving to a new location within San Quentin. We hope to correct your postage problem as soon as possible.
Thank you for your understanding and patience.
Design Editor,
Richard ‘Bonaru’ Richardson
